There is a doomsday message that is swiftly gaining global acceptance. The new wave is clothed in acceptable clichés and has won over the support of many of the respected scientific communities.
Unlike most other doomsday messages, this one is supposedly based upon scientific evidence. The scientific “doomsdayers” wear masks and pretend that they are predicting calamities based on hard evidence. This lulls the unsuspecting public into absolute belief and acceptance of the doomsdayers’ ravings.
If the same message were given in a spiritual setting, the adherents would probably be encouraged to turn to God in preparation for the final days. Generally, scientists have sneered at and mocked spiritual predictions regarding the end times, and the same scientists have convinced the general public to do likewise. Further, governments of the world use their police powers to suppress, restrict, or even eliminate these spiritual-based groups. Scientists have now one-upped the spiritual believers by supporting their dire predictions of calamity with supposed scientific evidence. Using their scientific clout, they have now convinced most of the world leaders to meet in Copenhagen. The stated agenda of the gathering is to halt global warming with a unified and urgent approach.
People may remember that there have been similar gatherings to solve the global economic crisis. In those meetings, every leader attending was told to boost their economies by stimulus spending. By and large, the world leaders have dutifully followed those dictates. One might ask: Is the global recession over due to this unified approach – or is it deepening? Many thinking economists have finally realized the latter to be the case.
In Copenhagen, world leaders will be adopting mandated solutions to the impending doomsday that the scientists have predicted based on global warming. The world leaders will be asked to forego meaningful debate or reasonable consideration of whether the proposed solutions are prudent or effective. They will be ordered to turn over their governance on global warming in the same manner they surrendered it regarding the global economic crisis. In other words, the Copenhagen summit is just for show. None of the leaders will have any meaningful input. The decisions have already been made by the ruling elite before the world leaders even agreed to assemble to discuss the issues. Copenhagen is really just a meeting place where the orders will be disseminated, and the world leaders will be expected to follow those dictates. The global warming agenda has long been calculated and is now being played out.
The urgent push for the global treaty to counteract greenhouse gases and global climate change is politically important to the ruling elite, even though it is disguised as a natural science issue. One justification cited for the summit is that the world is getting hotter, despite refutations of this by some climatologists whose voices have been suppressed. Those assuming that the Earth is heating up often cite the increased incidence of disastrous weather anomalies. Right now, for example, Great Britain has experienced unprecedented rainfall and flooding.
There is no denying that other disasters, including fires, heatwaves, floods, droughts, storms, wind, rain, hail and other “natural” events have had catastrophic effects on certain regions, and dramatically affected ecosystems, flora, fauna and human societies. But, is the increase in weather abnormalities due to global warming, or the effect of other causes? In reality, many of the recent calamitous events have been artificially unleashed, sometimes as experiments and other times as weapons, a notable example of the latter being the Boxing Day tsunami. Even if global warming were reversed, there are still the massive problems of the increasing incidence of earthquakes and the phenomenon of the hotter sun to deal with. The ruling elite will not touch these issues because to even address them could cause public panic. If there is a mass panic, the ruling elite could lose control.
The pressure on carbon trading is based upon the notion that humans are primarily responsible for global warming. Relying on this notion, the scientific community appears to be speaking as one voice, spreading the warning that carbon emissions are the main culprit for global warming. Many people have been convinced by the scientific doomsdayers because they have been “educated” to accept everything that has a scientific basis behind it.
In fact, the data on global warming is inconclusive. To have real science applied to the issue, and not Al Gore-style propaganda, the data should be made public and available to all members of the scientific community and any lay groups that have interest in it.
Al Gore’s campaign sends the “green” message that the Earth’s survival hangs in the balance and is at risk. If this be true, then open and public debate on the issue should be welcomed by the proponents of the carbon-trading schemes. Instead, many opposing voices have been silenced, mocked, targeted or totally ignored. The carbon-trading scheme proponents do not want to have the facts heard; they want their position accepted and adopted.
It is not that the “green” voice on climate change is entirely emotion based, with science used to fill in gaps when it is expedient. It is undeniable that human acts such as massive deforestation or large-scale irrigation, damming and other huge hydro projects can dramatically and negatively affect regional ecosystems. But, is there a significant and undeniable correlation between these types of activities and global warming? To put it another way, if humans ceased to reside on the Earth tomorrow, would the problem of global warming be resolved? It might come as a surprise to most people that the removal of humans from the planet would not abate the problem of global warming.
Were the carbon traders truly concerned that global warming is a seriously urgent issue, they could perhaps justify following their untested carbon-trading notion. But if it were an urgent situation, why would they offer a solution that will take decades to take effect? If they have decades to work on the solution, by definition, it cannot be that urgent. And, if they have decades to implement their plan, could they not spend at least a few years or even a few months openly and transparently debating which course of action will save the planet from its imminent death?
To demonstrate the absurdity of the current “green” position, consider that they are proposing massive increases in nuclear power because it is supposed to be carbon friendly. The nuclear proponents do not seem to care about the disposal of nuclear waste from these sites. This means that they are presenting an extremely short-sighted solution, which is not really a solution at all. Besides, the proponents of expanding nuclear power want to tremendously restrict who can and who cannot use nuclear power. For instance, Iran and North Korea are presently being ostracized for, among other things, having nuclear-power programmes. This is a glaring instance where part of the real agenda of the ruling elite shows through; the nuclear proponents are not as concerned about global warming as they are with political dominance.
As indicated earlier, humans are only marginally responsible for global warming. The hotter sun is undeniable, and it is the main reason for global warming. A few years ago, unnatural events on Earth were causing temperature rises, but these were not caused by humans. The Lemurian aliens who resided underwater knew that the Earth was heating up and would become uninhabitable in the future. (This is primarily related to the increased speed of the sun’s hexahedron and the deterioration of the Earth’s icosahedron.) Therefore, the Lemurians began heating up the ice shelves attached to Antarctica to release their mothercrafts that were encased in the continent’s ice. They employed several underwater heating devices to free their mothercrafts, which melted massive amounts of Antarctica’s ice. This had a major impact on global water temperatures, which noticeably affected the weather. However, the Lemurians have freed their mothercrafts and turned off their underwater heating equipment. Thus, the Lemurians are no longer contributing to global warming. It was an alien-inflicted, one-off condition that is no longer relevant to the problem of global warming. Moreover, the Olcars have been experimenting with melting glaciers and causing various catastrophic weather events for their own agenda. Neither the Lemurians nor the Olcars are human.
There is a saying that since money equals power in this materialistic world, the ones who have money control the world. There is another saying that any organization or nation that has the means of controlling the weather will ultimately control the world. However, a more effective and subtle way of controlling the masses is via controlling their minds. Mind control can be done with radiation and broadcasting frequencies, among other means. Once people’s minds are being monitored and manipulated, the illusion of choice is removed, and people are effectively programmed to act according to the dictates of those who control their minds. There is a common thread in all the important global issues that are facing the world. This common thread is world control. The world leaders are in effect being brain-washed into relinquishing their duties to protect their respective nations in the name of doing something for the higher good.
This would be all well and good if it could be believed that scientists are acting in the people’s best interests. But, since when have scientists been assumed to be altruistic? Why is it accepted that they will only act in the best interests of humans? And why should it be accepted that the scientists are correct about human causes of global warming?
Are not scientists responsible for developing biological, chemical, nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction that have been used to control, bully, harm or destroy certain groups and places? It is not so far fetched to say that many scientific developments are amoral.
So, should world leaders turn over their moral consciences to scientists who are knowingly or unwittingly working for the ruling elite? The ruling elite have their own agenda, which is definitely not in the best interests of the people.
The carbon-trading schemes, and other emissions-based solutions presented by the ruling elite’s scientific doomsdayers, will not solve global warming. But, if they get their way, they will change the lives of people for the worse. That is part of the ruling elite’s agenda.
© 2009 Amitakh Stanford